Cronología

Proceso Degenerativo

Indice / Index

Juez Torack

Páginas María José

Recogida de Firmas

Contacta

Before the Judgment of New Jersey.

The Authorization of Sara Husban and Angel Hernandez to publish the engraved conversations.

After the Judgment of New Jersey.

Armed assault days before the beginning of the Judgment. Download. IMPORTANT.

Conclusions.

1. Supposedly: “The District attorney of the New Jersey case against Maria Jose Carrascosa, Carol Novey Catuogno, compelled the Witnesses sending Police Sergeant Charles Ryan to threaten them at their homes. She wanted to make them sign Depositions against Maria José through her attorneys in a Court. Therefore, this means rigging the Popular Jury and Judge Donald Venezia himself”.
   
   
2. Unconditional support to Peter Innes by Judge Edward Torack. That is why all of Maria Jose’s attorneys were never against his "protected" citizen, though he had battered her. But the last one of them, Scott Finckenauer, is the one who having all these documented evidences NEVER highlighted them in any of the New Jersey courts. We suppose he was thus trying to achieve his own goal: “cleaning” his working file: his attorney's License had been WITHDRAWN from Him for 3 months in year 2002. This attorney did not contact María José’s first lawyers Lesnevich & Marzano-Lesnevich, LLC and in the last year he NEVER spoke directly with the Carrascosa Family. He limited himself to report to the EFE Agency about everything that was going on.
   
   
3. Peter Innes - Petición a Projusticia

http://www.antena3noticias.com/PortalA3N/noticia/ciencia-y-tecnologia/familia-Maria-Jose-Carrascosa-aporta-nuevas-pruebas-para-absolucion/9156115

http://xpuntodevista.blogspot.com/2009/12/el-caso-carrascosa-hoy.html